Thursday, 25 January 2018

DEFINING, DEVELOPING AND DELIVERING DELIVERABLES




One of the key tenants of PRINCE2 and Project Delivery is to be very clear on what needs to be delivered, by whom, when, and against what criteria.

A “product description” or “deliverable detail” should describe the item, possibly including format, content, specification depending on whether is a intangible item (eg review, report, policy, process) or tangible item (eg a PC, house, oil rig) .

It might also detail the author, owner, and approver (or equivalent which might be architect, builder, QS, owner) and the acceptance process so that there is clarity on what is or is not acceptable.

If you do all this there is a risk you spend more time describing the product and process than you actually spend developing and delivering it.  However the other risk is that you spend time developing and delivering something that is not suitable, feasible, acceptable or agreed.

It can be tricky to get the balance right.

There are plenty of good guides and template, particularly for PRINCE2

PROJECT MANAGER V PROJECT LEADER

Often a client knows they have a need, but are not 100% clear on the solution or indeed the components and criteria necessary to satisfy their needs.

A Project Manager is someone who can deliver exactly what is required, on-time, on-budget, to-specification with low-risk and high-communications

A Project Leader is someone who can help the client develop clarity on exactly what they need. This may be by workshop, facilitation or prototyping. Once that clarity is there developing and delivering is much more straight-forward.

CLARITY V COMPLEXITY

As noted above, the level of detail that goes into describing and documenting what is required can either add clarity or complexity. Too little detail and there is ambiguity of product, roles, responsibility, time-scale or cost. Too much detail and “…it all looks too difficult..”


One approach is to use a database and then switch-on or off the elements that you and the client feel need documentation.

This then allows you to dial-up or down the clarity v complexity ideally to the point where everyone is singing from the same hymn sheet and that hymn sheet has both words and music necessary for each project participant.

Below is an example of some headings which you might consider.

DELIVERABLENAME:  This is the name, title or short description identifier

REQUIREMENT:  It is important to briefly outline the need, so as to be clear what the requirement is that needs to be satisfied.

PURPOSE:  It is also useful to clarity the purpose. Whilst the need is what needs to be delivered, the purpose is why. To…[be faster, cheaper, better, safer, compliant]

INSCOPE:  It is useful to be clear what is included, and what is not included. If there are changes of requirement having a clear scope will help assess the impact of changes on time, budget, or quality of output or outcome.

OUTSCOPE: It is useful to be clear what is included, and what is not included. Taking the time to say what is not included may be useful to managing stakeholders who want to extend the work or scope to satisfy their own ends. This “scope-creep” can push up costs and add to time, without adding value to the outputs or outcome.

CRITERIA:  It is useful to be clear on acceptance criteria, which may be passing an audit or standard ISO or SOC or perhaps satisfying a key output or outcome, possibly measured by KPIs

GUIDANCE:  You might want to refer to relevant guidance including laws and regulations, or policy, procedures and processes

FORMAT:  If it is intangible the output may be a report, certification, perhaps in a .doc, .pdf, .xls or other format. If it is tangible the output may be described in a specification eg bicycle, moped, motorbike, car, van or bus.

CONTENT:  If it is intangible the output may be a report headings: Introduction; Executive Summary; Method; Report; Recommendations. If it is tangible the output may be described in a specification eg blue-prints, architects drawings, technical details.

AUTHOR:  The supplier
OWNER:  The customer
APPROVER:  The authority

METHOD:  In some cases the process is as important as the outcome. This is true where there are many stakeholders, different views, change or cultural implications. Being clear on the approach is useful. It might be simply gather agreed information and inputs (including existing policy, process, paperwork); Meet agreed stakeholders; Draft report; Consult; Review; Finalise report


DAYS:  Estimating days is always difficult because the availability of people and resources can speed things up or slow things down. Try however to give a realistic indication of time, based on sensible assumptions about the availability of data, people, process and technology. It is also important to differentiate between time on the clock (“I spent 5 hours on this”) and elapsed time (“it took 5 days to meet everyone and get everything done”). Finally, if time is related to cost, then this needs to be clear: Is time per hour, per half-day, per day or fixed for the deliverable?

LIMITATIONS:  It is important to outline any risks or limitations. For example progress and content may be dependent upon availability of people and data, and consequently subject to variation. [Albeit within the control of Owner/Approver as regards resources and priority] Other constraining factors may be time or budget.a

NOTES:  You might want to include additional notes or comments.

Doing all the above may be onerous but in some cases may be worth the invested of time and thought.

In an effort to simplify you might combine elements. For example requirement + purpose. You could combine criteria + guidance + format + content.

I recommend you talk with the client or customer and agree the best approach to ensure mutual understanding and a shared commitment to delivery.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Tim Rogers is a Qualified Change Practitioner and PRINCE2 Project Manager, with an MBA in Management Consultancy. Past projects have included the incorporation of Ports of Jersey and Operations Change and Sales Support for RBSI and NatWest. He is a tutor/lecturer for the Chartered Management Institute. 

CONTACT

TimHJRogers@AdaptConsultingCompany.Com
+447797762051 Skype: timhjrogers TimHJRogers@gmail.com

Wednesday, 24 January 2018

Effective digital marketing campaigns for charities (or anyone else!)


CAMPAIGN AIM

So, what is your campaign aim? Whether it’s to achieve a certain fundraising target, improve your site’s authority, drive increased traffic to your site, or boost followers on your social media accounts; anything is achievable. Just ensure that everyone on the campaign is moving towards the same goal and make your objectives precise, measurable and realistic

UNDERSTAND YOUR AUDIENCE

You need to understand your audience and be aware of social and economic factors that might affect them engaging with your campaign.

Create a typical target audience member. You can find out interests, likes and motivations using your website’s analytics, as well as they’re typical gender, age and location. Who’s following your organisation on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram? These are also people who might engage with your campaign.

UTILISE SOCIAL MEDIA

Also, you should utilise social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, to find out which posts/Tweets get likes and which don’t — this also lets you know what content might work in your campaign. Also, don’t forget to make the most your email list. Fire off a survey to these contacts for a better understanding of who they are.

Be aware however of GDPR and whether you have agreement to fire off a survey to these contacts, otherwise you may be better to simply host a survey and let people volunteer to complete it.

THE ISSUE YOU WANT TO SOLVE

What do you want people to think about after you’ve launched your campaign? In other words, what do you want people to associate with your charity and what it does? This differs from your campaign goal, as it’s more to do with: the issue you want to solve, the answer that you propose and the action the audience can take.
You don’t want people to forget who you are, so your campaign needs to be special to your organisation.

Use Instagram and Facebook to get quality images of your charity at work out there. You can even use the photos on roll-up banners and place these in busy public spaces. Record interviews, upload pictures, create memes, and even do a ‘day-in-the-life-of’ detailing a colleague or recent beneficiary of your charity and upload this to YouTube. After all, showing people what your charity can do is far more effective than just telling them.

There’s no better way to reach a lot of people in very little time for free than social media. Use your charity’s online platforms —Twitter, Facebook and Instagram — to boost your campaign and encourage people to share your posts, videos, photos and Tweets.

Although digital marketing is highly effective when your aim is to create a campaign on a budget, you can also use some print marketing materials in order to engage with audience members that aren’t active online.

IMAGES AND INSIGHTFUL VIDEOS

Experts predict a sizeable shift towards video content as a form of marketing, socialising and engaging online. If that’s the case, why not get ahead of the game and start creating plenty of video content to push your campaign today? Aside from being a faster and easier way for the public to engage with your campaign material, video and image content is also free to capture using a smartphone!

Just remember, that powerful images and insightful videos can only do so much. You must merge these with strong, emotive and informative copy to support them. Content online varies from words you’d read in a book or in a magazine, so you need to be aware of the differences to maximise on its potential. Online content needs to be punchy, short and powerful.

Although you might be dealing with hard-hitting issues, digital copy must retain a chatty, familiar tone at all times. A light-hearted persona is key if you want people to carry on reading — nobody wants a lecture when they’re scrolling through Twitter or reading their emails during a break.

Achieving your marketing potential using digital tactics is a tough, but reachable goal. If your charity has little cash to spare, follow these digital marketing tips to help cut the costs of creating a successful campaign.

DATA PROTECTION AND DIGITAL MARKETING

There is some god guidance on the dos and donts of Data Protection and digital marketing here
http://gdprjersey.blogspot.com/2017/12/jersey-charity-advice-on-gdpr-and.html


SOURCE
https://tinyurl.com/y949jtkd

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Tim Rogers is a Qualified Change Practitioner and PRINCE2 Project Manager, with an MBA in Management Consultancy. Past projects have included the incorporation of Ports of Jersey and Operations Change and Sales Support for RBSI and NatWest. He is a tutor/lecturer for the Chartered Management Institute. 

CONTACT
TimHJRogers@AdaptConsultingCompany.Com
+447797762051 Skype: timhjrogers TimHJRogers@gmail.com

Sunday, 21 January 2018

Google Spent Years Studying Effective Teams. This Single Quality Contributed Most to Their Success


Google Spent Years Studying Effective Teams. This Single Quality Contributed Most to Their Success

What matters isn't so much who's on your team, but rather how the team works together. So what was the most important factor contributing to a team's effectiveness?

It was psychological safety - TRUST

Simply put, psychological safety refers to an individual's perception of taking a risk, and the response his or her teammates will have to taking that risk.

Google describes it this way: In a team with high psychological safety, teammates feel safe to take risks around their team members. They feel confident that no one on the team will embarrass or punish anyone else for admitting a mistake, asking a question, or offering a new idea.

Key Elements

1.    Listen first.
2.    Show empathy.
3.    Be authentic.
4.    Set the example.
5.    Be helpful.
6.    Disagree and commit.
7.    Be humble.
8.    Be transparent.
9.    Commend sincerely and specifically.
I highly recommend reading the full article (source below). The interesting think about trust is that it is a function of shared values, beliefs, education and attitude (hope for the future) and  delivery, rewards, benefits (experience of the past truth).

Whilst the key elements above might seem universal I am not sure that trust is.

There are plenty of political leaders who exhibit many of the above traits, but faith in politicians is arguably at an all-time low. I highly recommend the book Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari as an insight to past, present and future and how this shapes our attitudes, expectations and drive. The story below is telling.

In the months leading up to the expedition of Apollo 11, the astronauts trained in a remote moon-like desert in the western United States. The area is home to several Native American communities. One days, as they were training, the astronauts came across an old Native American. The man asked them what they were doing there. They replied that they were part of a research expedition that would shortly travel to explore the moon. When the old man heard that, he fell silent for a few moments, and then asked the astronauts if they could do him a favor.

"What do you want?" they asked."Well," said the old man, "the people of my tribe believe that holy spirits live on the moon. I was wondering if you could pass an important message to them from my people."

"What's the message?" asked the astronauts.The man uttered something in his tribal language, and then asked the astronauts to repeat it again and again until they had memorized it correctly.

"What does it mean?" asked the astronauts."Oh, I cannot tell you. It's a secret that only our tribe and the moon spirits are allowed to know."

When they returned to their base, the astronauts searched and searched until they found someone who could speak the tribal language, and asked him to translate the secret message. When they repeated what they had memorized, the translator started to laugh uproariously. When he calmed down, the astronauts asked him what it meant.

The man explained that the sentence they had memorized so carefully said, "Don't believe a single word these people are telling you. They are here to steal your lands!"

Yuval Noah Harari goes on to say that given the divisions of nations, religions, and politics the key remaining unit in which all trust despite our differences is money.

As much as fine qualities may help build a team it is frequently the pursuit of reward (money, fame, success) that really bind them.

SOURCE
By Justin Bariso Founder, Insight@JustinJBariso
https://www.inc.com/justin-bariso/google-spent-years-studying-effective-teams-this-single-quality-contributed-most-to-their-success.html

Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapiens:_A_Brief_History_of_Humankind

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Tim Rogers is a Qualified Change Practitioner and PRINCE2 Project Manager, with an MBA in Management Consultancy. Past projects have included the incorporation of Ports of Jersey and Operations Change and Sales Support for RBSI and NatWest. He is a tutor/lecturer for the Chartered Management Institute.

CONTACT
TimHJRogers@AdaptConsultingCompany.Com
+447797762051 Skype: timhjrogers TimHJRogers@gmail.com

Wednesday, 20 December 2017

Stories are very, very powerful - maybe too powerful?



I am reminded of the phrase: Never let the truth get in the way of a good story?

Reading Michael Lewis' The Undoing Project, there are some great lessons for all professionals, management and leadership.  The examination of perception versus reality and the bias of personal experience over worldly fact is unnerving.

Too many decisions are based on flawed thinking, influenced by emotional circumstances with more effort spend on excuses (stories?) rather than pursuit of the truth. If something appears true-enough then people look no further.

Plausible stories (fake news?) undermines projects and change, management and leadership which are based on combination of Trust and Truth.

Key points

People predict by making up stories
People predict very little and explain everything
People live under uncertainty whether they like it or not
People accept any explanation as long as it fits the facts

The problem appears to be that stories based on feelings and scenarios are emotionally engaging and gather followers whereas facts demand too much effort. In the pursuit of eQ have we sacrificed iQ?

Stories deliver power to orators.

Rhetoric, or the art of persuasion, is an ancient topic that's no less relevant today. We are in a golden age of information sharing, which means you are swimming in a pool of rhetoric every day, whether you realise it or not. 

Hitler understood the power of words: He saw them as a tool which he needed to master if he wanted to achieve his goals. He had a strong vision which he believed in passionately and he knew that he needed his people to share that passion if he was to succeed.

FURTHER READING
https://www.farnamstreetblog.com/2016/11/words-like-loaded-pistols-wartime-rhetoric/

RECOMMENDED BOOK
https://www.amazon.com/Undoing-Project-Friendship-Changed-Minds/dp/0393254593

Never let the truth get in the way of a good story: Your review of 2017?



Reading Michael Lewis' The Undoing Project, there are some great lessons for all professionals, management and leadership. The examination of perception versus reality and the bias of personal experience over worldly fact is unnerving.

Too many decisions are based on flawed thinking, influenced by emotional circumstances with more effort spend on excuses (for errors) rather than pursuit of the truth.

The after the fact justification for failed prognosis or planning is prevalent even in expert professions including doctors and lawyers as well as those predicting elections or referendums. Subjective probability (A hunch of 60% chance of xxxx) is rife and undermines projects and change, management and leadership which are based on combination of Trust and Truth.

Given that most project and change efforts fail this is sobering and worthy of scrutiny as we reflect on 2017 and plan for 2018. How can we better anticipate error, omission or failing to better recruit support and ensure success?

The problem appears to be that stories based on feelings and scenarios are emotionally engaging and gather followers whereas facts demand too much effort. In the pursuit of eQ have we sacrificed iQ?

FURTHER READING

https://www.amazon.com/Undoing-Project-Friendship-Changed-Minds/dp/0393254593
http://lenzwelling.blogspot.com/2017/01/the-undoing-project.html

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Tim Rogers is a Qualified Change Practitioner and PRINCE2 Project Manager, with an MBA in Management Consultancy. Past projects have included the incorporation of Ports of Jersey and Operations Change and Sales Support for RBSI and NatWest. He has also helped SME's streamline systems and scale-up operations and managed growth by acquisitions. He is a tutor/lecturer for the Chartered Management Institute.
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/timhjrogers

CONTACT

tim@timhjrogers.com @TimHJRogers +447797762051
http://www.timhjrogers.com

COMPANY

TimHJRogers@AdaptConsultingCompany.Com
http://www.AdaptConsultingCompany.Com
Consult CoCreate Deliver
#Leadership #Management #Process #Change #Analysis
#GDPR #CyberSecurity #CMI

Tuesday, 15 August 2017

Coaching, Mentoring, and Change Management in a Business Environment.



Like many I have been viewing Wimbledon and more recently the World Athletics Championships. I have noted the role and responsibility of coaches towards their athletes and the goals they achieve. I have also noted that in many cases champions find that at critical points they need to change the coach and approach.

I have recently read (and highly recommend) Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead by Sheryl Sandberg, and Nell Scovell. I note Sheryl’s view is that mentoring need not be formal, structured or necessarily agreed, but instead can be as simple as an exchange of views or advice.

This got me thinking about the role, responsibilities and accountability of coaching and mentoring in a business environment and in particular in the context of managing change.

COACHING AND MENTORING – THE DIFFERENCE

Coaching and mentoring use the same skills and approach but coaching is short term task-based and mentoring is a longer term relationship. The CIPD differentiates between coaching, mentoring and counselling.

Once the coachee successfully acquires the skills, the coach is no longer needed. Mentoring is development driven. Its purpose is to develop the individual not only for the current job, but also for the future. This distinction differentiates the role of the immediate manager and that of the mentor.

Factor
Coaching
Mentoring
Key Goals
To correct inappropriate behaviour improve performable and impact skills
To support and guide personal growth
Initiative
The coach directly directs the learning
The protégé is in charge of the learning
Volunteer
Volunteering not necessary (although agreement to participate is essential)
Mentor and Protégé volunteer
Focus
Immediate problem and opportunities
Long-term personal career development
Roles
Heavy on telling with appropriate feedback
Heavy on listening, role modelling, making suggestions and connecting
Duration
Short-term as needed
Long-term
Relationship
Coach is often the boss
Mentor is rarely the boss

See further reading below for references




APPLYING SPORT COACHING TO BUSINESS CONTEXT

As a sports coach I am used to understanding aims and methods and breaking these into processes and behaviours which I can analyse, improve and measure.

Aim and method
Win British Championships by becoming faster, stronger, better, more stamina, less injured, healthier.

Process and behaviours
May include sleeping, training, eating, resting, stretching, thinking, planning, learning. I can analyse and measure fitness, power, strength, efficiency and knowledge (of conditions, equipment, technique) and much more.

Is it possible to compare business coaching with sport coaching and hold them accountable for business performance as much as a sport coach is responsible for athletic, team, national or Olympic performance?

Is it a step too far to hold the coach accountable for delivering performance? It seems to me some people who describe themselves as coaches are actually "mentors" or "therapists”, more interested in the relationship and wellbeing of the individual and won't think of themselves as responsible for performance outcomes.

I am wondering if it is unreasonable to judge a business coach by business performance, or indeed hold a coach accountable for culture and behaviour of those they support on the basis of their coaching interventions. This is what appears to happen in sport.

Should we not have the same for business coaches?

THE CHANGE MANAGEMENT KPIS OF A BUSINESS COACH

In a business context we may have critical success factors [CSF] (clearly identified things that make a difference) and key performance indicators [KPI] (clear measures that can be applied to monitor and measure progress, improvement and performance).

In a change management environment, we might look at values and behaviours, skills and competencies all of which can be applied in a skills matrix which assess current ability and performance and necessary changes.

Is there a way we can combine CSF and KPI and matrixes above to form a structured and co-ordinated approach which aligns people and process, values and behaviours, skills and competencies sufficient to create the capacity, drive and desire to achieve the planned changes and business performance?

Feedback and Discussion Welcome.

FURTHER READING

The Differences Between Coaching & Mentoring
http://www.management-mentors.com/resources/coaching-mentoring-differences

Coaching V. Mentoring
https://www.slideshare.net/wooded01/coaching-v-mentoring

6 Ways Of Measuring Coaching Effectiveness
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/6-ways-measure-coaching-effectiveness-ruma-biswas

Evaluating Coaching
https://diane-foster.com/articles-newsletters/025CanCoachingEffectivenessBeMeasuredBacon.pdf

Practical Methods for Evaluating Coaching
http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/system/files/resources/files/430.pdf

I am interested in this topic, if you have materials, case-studies or references that you feel would be useful please get in contact.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Tim Rogers is a Qualified Change Practitioner and PRINCE2 Project Manager, with an MBA in Management Consultancy. Past projects have included the incorporation of Ports of Jersey and Operations Change and Sales Support for RBSI and NatWest. He is a tutor/lecturer for the Chartered Management Institute.